{"id":10215,"date":"2026-10-28T09:29:44","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T08:29:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/discussion-of-a-recent-decision-by-dawid-marusczyk\/"},"modified":"2026-10-28T09:35:02","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T08:35:02","slug":"discussion-of-a-recent-decision-by-dawid-marusczyk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/discussion-of-a-recent-decision-by-dawid-marusczyk\/","title":{"rendered":"Discussion of a Recent Decision by Dawid Marusczyk"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Journal of International Economic Law (IWRZ, Issue 5\/2026, p. 254), <a href=\"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/team-member\/dawid-marusczyk\/\" data-type=\"team-mitglied\" data-id=\"9295\">Dawid Marusczyk<\/a> discusses a recent ruling by the Federal Court of Justice.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When can foreign court decisions be challenged in Germany, and what is the appropriate type of proceeding for doing so?<br\/><br\/>In its decision of February 19, 2026 (IX ZR 103\/25), the Federal Court of Justice clarified that the public policy defense against a Member State decision may be asserted exclusively in proceedings to refuse recognition and enforcement pursuant to \u00a7 1115 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) (Art. 45, 46 et seq. of the Brussels I Regulation). There is no scope for this in an action to oppose enforcement under Sections 1117 and 767 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision sharpens the distinction between these types of proceedings and clarifies the procedural framework of the German Code of Civil Procedure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the Journal of International Economic Law (IWRZ, Issue 5\/2026, p. 254), Dawid Marusczyk discusses a recent ruling by the Federal Court of Justice. When can foreign court decisions be challenged in Germany, and what is the appropriate type of proceeding for doing so? In its decision of February 19, 2026 (IX ZR 103\/25), the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":10216,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89,201],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-publications"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10215"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10217,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10215\/revisions\/10217"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tigges.legal\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}